↓ Skip to main content

Disease patterns of the homeless in Tokyo

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Disease patterns of the homeless in Tokyo
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02344463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takehito Takano, Keiko Nakamura, Sachiko Takeuchi, Masafumi Watanabe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Psychology 8 12%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,934,253
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#776
of 1,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,513
of 35,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them