| Title |
Suicide by charcoal burning in Taiwan: implications for means substitution by a case-linkage study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-007-0300-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chian-Jue Kuo, Yeates Conwell, Qin Yu, Chen-Huan Chiu, Ying-Yeh Chen, Shang-Ying Tsai, Chiao-Chicy Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 25% |
| Psychology | 6 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,318
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,578
of 160,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.