↓ Skip to main content

Looking for age-related growth decline in natural forests: unexpected biomass patterns from tree rings and simulated mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Looking for age-related growth decline in natural forests: unexpected biomass patterns from tree rings and simulated mortality
Published in
Oecologia, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2881-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane R. Foster, Anthony W. D’Amato, John B. Bradford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 23%
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 13%
Mathematics 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,505
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,357
of 324,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.