↓ Skip to main content

Intensive Dose-Dense Compared With Conventionally Scheduled Preoperative Chemotherapy for High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intensive Dose-Dense Compared With Conventionally Scheduled Preoperative Chemotherapy for High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2009
DOI 10.1200/jco.2008.20.3133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Untch, Volker Möbus, Walther Kuhn, Bernd Rudolph Muck, Christoph Thomssen, Ingo Bauerfeind, Nadia Harbeck, Christoph Werner, Annette Lebeau, Andreas Schneeweiss, Stephen Kahlert, Franz von Koch, Karl Ulrich Petry, Diethelm Wallwiener, Rolf Kreienberg, Ute-Susann Albert, Hans-Joachim Lück, Axel Hinke, Fritz Jänicke, Gottfried E. Konecny

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Other 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#13,455
of 22,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,168
of 107,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#125
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.