| Title |
Comparison of dual-source ct coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10554-009-9568-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi Xu, Lijun Tang, Xiaomei Zhu, Hai Xu, Jinhua Tang, Zhijian Yang, Liansheng Wang, Dehang Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 26% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 42% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#351
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,388
of 173,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.