↓ Skip to main content

Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: A review of the research1,2

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: A review of the research1,2
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, September 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf02892289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lora E. Burke, Jacqueline M. Dunbar-Jacob, Martha N. Hill

Abstract

The efficacy of cardiovascular risk-reduction programs has been established. However, the extent to which risk-reduction interventions are effective may depend on adherence. Non-compliance, or non-adherence, may occur with any of the recommended or prescribed regimens and may vary across the treatment course. Compliance problems, whether occurring early or late in the treatment course, are clinically significant, as adherence is one mediator of the clinical outcome. This article, which is based on a review of the empirical literature of the past 20 years, addresses compliance across four regimens of cardiovascular risk reduction: pharmacological therapy, exercise, nutrition, and smoking cessation. The criteria for inclusion of a study in this review were: (a) focus on cardiovascular disease risk reduction; (b) report of a quantitative measure of compliance behavior; and (c) use of a randomized controlled design. Forty-six studies meeting these criteria were identified. A variety of self-report, objective, and electronic measurement methods were used across these studies. The interventions employed diverse combinations of cognitive, educational, and behavioral strategies to improve compliance in an array of settings. The strategies demonstrated to be successful in improving compliance included behavioral skill training, self-monitoring, telephone/mail contact, self-efficacy enhancement, and external cognitive aids. A series of tables summarize the intervention strategies, compliance measures, and findings, as well as the interventions demonstrated to be successful. This review reflects the progress made over two decades in compliance measurement and research and, further, advances made in the application of behavioral strategies to the promotion of cardiovascular risk reduction.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 148 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 27%
Psychology 22 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 44 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,684,821
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#307
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,375
of 30,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them