Title |
Looking for frailty in community-dwelling older persons: The Gerontopole Frailty Screening Tool (GFST)
|
---|---|
Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0363-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
B. Vellas, L. Balardy, S. Gillette-Guyonnet, G. Abellan Van Kan, A. Ghisolfi-Marque, J. Subra, S. Bismuth, S. Oustric, Matteo Cesari |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 18% |
Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 19% |
Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 17% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 45 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,093
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,804
of 210,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.