↓ Skip to main content

Consistency of performance ranking of comorbidity adjustment scores in canadian and U.S. utilization data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Consistency of performance ranking of comorbidity adjustment scores in canadian and U.S. utilization data
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2004
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30109.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Schneeweiss, Philip S. Wang, Jerry Avorn, Malcolm Maclure, Raia Levin, Robert J. Glynn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Professor 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,698
of 59,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.