↓ Skip to main content

Advances in management of Thalassemia

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Advances in management of Thalassemia
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12098-009-0048-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.B. Agarwal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 9%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Linguistics 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#286
of 1,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,933
of 94,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,548 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.