| Title |
Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc9309 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cornelis PC de Jager, Paul TL van Wijk, Rejiv B Mathoera, Jacqueline de Jongh-Leuvenink, Tom van der Poll, Peter C Wever |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 441 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
| Researcher | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 86 | 19% |
| Unknown | 147 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 208 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 154 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,312,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,078
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,868
of 109,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.