| Title |
Trends in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia in the Elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drugs & Aging, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/00002512-200522110-00004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen Lang, Craig C. Earle, Talia Foster, Deirdre Dixon, Renilt Van Gool, Joseph Menzin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 27% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#602
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,142
of 187,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#155
of 412 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 412 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.