↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fentanyl transdermal patch (Durogesic®D-TRANS) in chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fentanyl transdermal patch (Durogesic®D-TRANS) in chronic pain
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0785-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Hoon Park, Jeoung Hee Kim, Sung Cheol Yun, Sung Woo Roh, Seung Chul Rhim, Chang Jin Kim, Sang Ryong Jeon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Engineering 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#589
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,481
of 95,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.