↓ Skip to main content

Viral Screening and Assisted Conception Treatment—The Bourn Hall Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, July 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Viral Screening and Assisted Conception Treatment—The Bourn Hall Experience
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, July 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1020414318129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naim Abusheikha, Fidelis Akagbosu, Samuel Marcus, Amir Lass, Caroline Cousins, Peter Brinsden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Librarian 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#517
of 1,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,366
of 34,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.