| Title |
Six- versus 12-h conversion method from intravenous to transdermal fentanyl in chronic cancer pain: a randomized study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-010-0890-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Motoo Nomura, Minoru Kamata, Hiroyuki Kojima, Kenji Hayashi, Masasuke Kozai, Satoshi Sawada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,889
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,357
of 96,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.