↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of end-tidal carbon dioxide role in predicting elevated SOFA scores and lactic acidosis

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of end-tidal carbon dioxide role in predicting elevated SOFA scores and lactic acidosis
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11739-008-0153-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel C. McGillicuddy, Aimee Tang, Lauren Cataldo, Julia Gusev, Nathan I. Shapiro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Master 10 19%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,533,599
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#207
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,058
of 82,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them