↓ Skip to main content

Acute effects of intramuscular and sublingual buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone in non-dependent opioid abusers

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Acute effects of intramuscular and sublingual buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone in non-dependent opioid abusers
Published in
Psychopharmacology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00213-010-1898-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela N. Duke, Christopher J. Correia, Sharon L. Walsh, George E. Bigelow, Eric C. Strain

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Psychology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,107
of 5,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,860
of 94,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.