| Title |
Comparison of systemic and regional effects of dobutamine and dopexamine in norepinephrine-treated septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001340050986 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B. Levy, L. Nace, P.-E. Bollaert, B. Dousset, J. P. Mallie, A. Larcan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 48% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,865
of 5,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,109
of 34,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.