↓ Skip to main content

The use of ultrasound in clinical setting for children affected by NAFLD: is it safe and accurate?

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The use of ultrasound in clinical setting for children affected by NAFLD: is it safe and accurate?
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1824-7288-37-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerio Nobili, Claudia Della Corte, Lidia Monti, Anna Alisi, Ariel Feldstein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#332
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,664
of 130,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them