↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in Obese Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in Obese Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass
Published in
Obesity Surgery, September 2005
DOI 10.1381/0960892055002347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilo Boza, Arnoldo Riquelme, Luis Ibañez, Ignacio Duarte, Enrique Norero, Paola Viviani, Alejandro Soza, Jose Ignacio Fernandez, Alejandro Raddatz, Sergio Guzman, Marco Arrese

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 23 27%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#1,382
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,268
of 71,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.