↓ Skip to main content

Electrocardiographic Findings in Sertraline Depression Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Drug Investigation, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Electrocardiographic Findings in Sertraline Depression Trials
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/bf03259409
Authors

Charles Fisch, Suzanne B. Knoebel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Chemistry 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Drug Investigation
#318
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,985
of 193,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Drug Investigation
#30
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.