You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x676456 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Si Si, John R Moss, Thomas R Sullivan, Skye S Newton, Nigel P Stocks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 54 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#723,541
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#305
of 4,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,390
of 321,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.