↓ Skip to main content

The Major Depression Inventory versus Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in a population sample

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The Major Depression Inventory versus Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in a population sample
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00127-005-0876-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Forsell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 6%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Master 9 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Psychology 6 18%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2010.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,318
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,446
of 61,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.