| Title |
A Randomized Prospective Study of Rehabilitation Therapy in the Treatment of Radiation-induced Dysphagia and Trismus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00066-010-2151-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y. Tang, Q. Shen, Y. Wang, K. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. Peng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#122
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,536
of 181,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.