| Title |
Complications Associated With Embolization in the Treatment of Blunt Splenic Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-007-9322-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shih‐Chi Wu, Ray‐Jade Chen, Albert D. Yang, Cheng‐Cheng Tung, Kun‐Hua Lee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,515
of 4,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,961
of 156,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.