↓ Skip to main content

Imaging of acute traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Imaging of acute traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta
Published in
European Radiology, June 2001
DOI 10.1007/s003300100971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Wintermark, Stefan Wicky, Pierre Schnyder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Egypt 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Postgraduate 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 82%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,152
of 4,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,760
of 38,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.