| Title |
Staging of untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT: comparison with conventional imaging work-up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-009-1080-6 |
| Authors |
Shu-Hang Ng, Sheng-Chieh Chan, Tzu-Chen Yen, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Chun-Ta Liao, Sheung-Fat Ko, Feng-Yuan Liu, Shu-Chyn Chin, Kang-Hsing Fan, Cheng-Lung Hsu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 29% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 86% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#981
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,700
of 177,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.