You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of electronic decision support and electronic remote blood issue on transfusion practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transfusion Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/tme.12149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. P. Hibbs, S. Noel, D. Miles, J. Staves, M. F. Murphy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,189,593
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Transfusion Medicine
#167
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,353
of 242,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transfusion Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.