↓ Skip to main content

Calories, carbohydrates, and cancer therapy with radiation: exploiting the five R’s through dietary manipulation

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 866)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
51 news outlets
twitter
61 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
12 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Calories, carbohydrates, and cancer therapy with radiation: exploiting the five R’s through dietary manipulation
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10555-014-9495-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rainer J. Klement, Colin E. Champ

Abstract

Aggressive tumors typically demonstrate a high glycolytic rate, which results in resistance to radiation therapy and cancer progression via several molecular and physiologic mechanisms. Intriguingly, many of these mechanisms utilize the same molecular pathways that are altered through calorie and/or carbohydrate restriction. Furthermore, poorer prognosis in cancer patients who display a glycolytic phenotype characterized by metabolic alterations, such as obesity and diabetes, is now well established, providing another link between metabolic pathways and cancer progression. We review the possible roles for calorie restriction (CR) and very low carbohydrate ketogenic diets (KDs) in modulating the five R's of radiotherapy to improve the therapeutic window between tumor control and normal tissue complication probability. Important mechanisms we discuss include (1) improved DNA repair in normal, but not tumor cells; (2) inhibition of tumor cell repopulation through modulation of the PI3K-Akt-mTORC1 pathway downstream of insulin and IGF1; (3) redistribution of normal cells into more radioresistant phases of the cell cycle; (4) normalization of the tumor vasculature by targeting hypoxia-inducible factor-1α downstream of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway; (5) increasing the intrinsic radioresistance of normal cells through ketone bodies but decreasing that of tumor cells by targeting glycolysis. These mechanisms are discussed in the framework of animal and human studies, taking into account the commonalities and differences between CR and KDs. We conclude that CR and KDs may act synergistically with radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer patients and provide some guidelines for implementing these dietary interventions into clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 228 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Other 15 6%
Other 50 21%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 11%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 42 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 452. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2020.
All research outputs
#59,389
of 24,975,845 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#3
of 866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#467
of 317,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,975,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.