| Title |
Meta‐analysis of Vascular and Neoplastic Events Associated with Tamoxifen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20724.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R Scott Braithwaite, Rowan T Chlebowski, Joseph Lau, Suzanne George, Rachel Hess, Nananda F Col |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,723,083
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,962
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,215
of 146,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.