↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for working memory storage operations in perceptual cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for working memory storage operations in perceptual cortex
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13415-013-0246-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kartik K. Sreenivasan, Caterina Gratton, Jason Vytlacil, Mark D’Esposito

Abstract

Isolating the short-term storage component of working memory (WM) from the myriad of associated executive processes has been an enduring challenge. Recent efforts have identified patterns of activity in visual regions that contain information about items being held in WM. However, it remains unclear (1) whether these representations withstand intervening sensory input and (2) how communication between multimodal association cortex and the unimodal perceptual regions supporting WM representations is involved in WM storage. We present evidence that the features of a face held in WM are stored within face-processing regions, that these representations persist across subsequent sensory input, and that information about the match between sensory input and a memory representation is relayed forward from perceptual to prefrontal regions. Participants were presented with a series of probe faces and indicated whether each probe matched a target face held in WM. We parametrically varied the feature similarity between the probe and target faces. Activity within face-processing regions scaled linearly with the degree of feature similarity between the probe face and the features of the target face, suggesting that the features of the target face were stored in these regions. Furthermore, directed connectivity measures revealed that the direction of information flow that was optimal for performance was from sensory regions that stored the features of the target face to dorsal prefrontal regions, supporting the notion that sensory input is compared to representations stored within perceptual regions and is subsequently relayed forward. Together, these findings indicate that WM storage operations are carried out within perceptual cortex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 38%
Neuroscience 16 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,746,742
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#583
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,868
of 312,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.