↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of a non-invasive scoring system in predicting the outcome of electrophysiologic studies in non-invasively unexplained syncope

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Usefulness of a non-invasive scoring system in predicting the outcome of electrophysiologic studies in non-invasively unexplained syncope
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, February 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00392-003-0897-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karlheinz Seidl, Axel Drögemüller, Monika Rameken, Ralf Zahn, Steffen Schneider, Jochen Senges

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#415
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,232
of 140,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them