↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Strategies for Treating Duodenal Ulcer

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Strategies for Treating Duodenal Ulcer
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-199711040-00008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Badia, Josep Lluis Segú, Ariadna Ollé, Max Brosa, Joan Monés, Lorenzo García Ponte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#890
of 1,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,997
of 279,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#19
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.