↓ Skip to main content

Dyspepsia in healthy blood donors

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, May 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Dyspepsia in healthy blood donors
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, May 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02087563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald Holtmann, Harald Goebell, Marianne Holtmann, Nicholas J. Talley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,379
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,842
of 23,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.