↓ Skip to main content

Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review
Published in
International Orthopaedics, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00264-011-1234-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dean Pakvis, Gijs van Hellemondt, Enrico de Visser, Wilco Jacobs, Maarten Spruit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Engineering 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#488
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,319
of 123,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.