↓ Skip to main content

Value of ultrasound in diagnosis of pneumothorax: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Radiology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Value of ultrasound in diagnosis of pneumothorax: a prospective study
Published in
Emergency Radiology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10140-012-1091-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Jalli, S. Sefidbakht, S. H. Jafari

Abstract

Transthoracic ultrasound (US) is useful in the evaluation of a wide range of peripheral parenchymal, pleural, and chest wall diseases. Furthermore, it is increasingly used to guide interventional procedures of the chest and pleural space. The role of chest US in the diagnosis of pneumothorax has been established, but comparison with lung computed tomography (CT) scanning has not yet been completely performed. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the accuracy of US with that of chest radiography in the detection of pneumothorax, with CT as the reference standard. One hundred ninety-seven patients who were evaluated by spiral chest CT scan for various clinical indications were prospectively evaluated. Ultrasonography was performed by a radiologist, blinded to the chest CT findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax were then compared with chest CT scan. CT scan showed pneumothorax in 92 patients. Sonography and plain X-ray of the chest revealed 74 and 56 cases of pneumothorax, respectively. Statistical analysis disclosed the US to be 80.4 % sensitive and 89 % specific in the detection of pneumothorax with an overall accuracy of 85 %. In this study, US was more sensitive than chest radiography in the detection of pneumothorax. The results of this study suggest that thoracic US, when performed by trained individuals, can be helpful for the detection of pneumothorax.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 11 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,946,186
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Radiology
#64
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,567
of 276,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Radiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them