↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with ‘staples’ or ‘subcuticular sutures’ in emergency Cesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with ‘staples’ or ‘subcuticular sutures’ in emergency Cesarean section
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00404-014-3274-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chanderdeep Sharma, Ashok Verma, Anjali Soni, Meghna Thusoo, V. K. Mahajan, Suresh Verma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Other 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#535
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,330
of 228,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.