↓ Skip to main content

Audit of an early feeding program after Cesarean delivery: Patient wellbeing is increased

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Audit of an early feeding program after Cesarean delivery: Patient wellbeing is increased
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf03017414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Benhamou, Monika Técsy, Nicholas Parry, Fréderic J. Mercier, Colette Burg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 43%
Psychology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,390
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,268
of 49,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.