| Title |
Usefulness of triple-phase thallium-201 SPECT in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): association with proliferative activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12149-008-0190-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seigo Fujita, Shigeki Nagamachi, Hideyuki Wakamatsu, Ryuichi Nishii, Shigemi Futami, Shozo Tamura, Yasunori Matsuzaki, Toshio Onizuka, Kinta Hatakeyama, Yujiro Asada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#115
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,224
of 170,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them