| Title |
Diagnostic value of microRNA-21 in the diagnosis of lung cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis involving 11 studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-014-2106-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renjie Wu, Yingjiu Jiang, Qingcheng Wu, Qiang Li, Dan Cheng, Ling Xu, Cheng Zhang, Ming Zhang, Ling Ye |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#414
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,737
of 227,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#19
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.