↓ Skip to main content

Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
European Radiology, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1194-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas C. Kwee, Robert M. Kwee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 118 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 18%
Other 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2010.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,152
of 4,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,358
of 91,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.