| Title |
Low back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-007-0439-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petra Jellema, Nicole van der Roer, Daniëlle A. W. M. van der Windt, Maurits W. van Tulder, Henriëtte E. van der Horst, Wim A. B. Stalman, Lex M. Bouter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 30% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#636
of 5,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,825
of 80,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.