↓ Skip to main content

Evidence based medicine in the use of botulinum toxin for back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Evidence based medicine in the use of botulinum toxin for back pain
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00702-007-0864-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Jabbari

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Philosophy 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#636
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,695
of 81,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.