↓ Skip to main content

Beneficial and Adverse Psychotropic Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs in Patients with Epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Beneficial and Adverse Psychotropic Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs in Patients with Epilepsy
Published in
CNS Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/11599780-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Piedad, Hugh Rickards, Frank M. C. Besag, Andrea E. Cavanna

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 35%
Psychology 7 11%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,668,752
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#695
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,998
of 171,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.