| Title |
Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees (Apis mellifera) and gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00265-001-0420-8 |
| Authors |
Sharoni Shafir, Tom A. Waite, Brian H. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 220 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 26% |
| Researcher | 45 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 105 | 44% |
| Psychology | 36 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,113,074
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#578
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,034
of 125,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.