↓ Skip to main content

Health economic evaluation in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic literature review anno 2005

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Health economic evaluation in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic literature review anno 2005
Published in
European Spine Journal, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00586-005-0031-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rikke Soegaard, Finn B. Christensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Researcher 11 19%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 49%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,021
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,130
of 154,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.