↓ Skip to main content

The impact of covariates on a bonus–malus system: an application of Taylor’s model

Overview of attention for article published in European Actuarial Journal, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The impact of covariates on a bonus–malus system: an application of Taylor’s model
Published in
European Actuarial Journal, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13385-015-0107-6
Authors

Jean Lemaire, Sojung Carol Park, Kili C. Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 38%
Student > Master 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 38%
Mathematics 3 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from European Actuarial Journal
#10
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,179
of 265,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Actuarial Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them