↓ Skip to main content

Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0204-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Ahn, Sang-Ho Lee, June Ho Lee, Jin Uk Kim, Wei Chiang Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 67%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#589
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,328
of 94,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.