↓ Skip to main content

Literature review: use of respite by carers of people with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Health & Social Care in the Community, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Literature review: use of respite by carers of people with dementia
Published in
Health & Social Care in the Community, January 2014
DOI 10.1111/hsc.12095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Neville, Elizabeth Beattie, Elaine Fielding, Margaret MacAndrew

Abstract

Respite care is a cornerstone service for the home management of people with dementia. It is used by carers to mitigate the stress related to the demands of caring by allowing time for them to rest and do things for themselves, thus maintaining the caring relationship at home and perhaps forestalling long-term placement in a residential aged care facility. Despite numerous anecdotal reports in support of respite care, its uptake by carers of people with dementia remains relatively low. The aim of this paper was to examine the factors that constitute the use of respite by carers of people with dementia by reviewing quantitative and qualitative research predominantly from the years 1990 to 2012. Seventy-six international studies of different types of respite care were included for this review and their methods were critically appraised. The key topics identified were in relation to information access, the barriers to carers realising need for and seeking respite, satisfaction with respite services including the outcomes for carers and people with dementia, the characteristics of an effective respite service and the role of health workers in providing appropriate respite care. Finally, limitations with considering the literature as a whole were highlighted and recommendations made for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 188 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 43 23%
Social Sciences 34 18%
Psychology 26 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health & Social Care in the Community
#995
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,130
of 321,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health & Social Care in the Community
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.