↓ Skip to main content

A molecular insight into papaya leaf curl—a severe viral disease

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
A molecular insight into papaya leaf curl—a severe viral disease
Published in
Protoplasma, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00709-017-1126-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyanka Varun, S. A. Ranade, Sangeeta Saxena

Abstract

Papaya leaf curl disease (PaLCuD) caused by papaya leaf curl virus (PaLCuV) not only affects yield but also plant growth and fruit size and quality of papaya and is one of the most damaging and economically important disease. Management of PaLCuV is a challenging task due to diversity of viral strains, the alternate hosts, and the genomic complexities of the viruses. Several management strategies currently used by plant virologists to broadly control or eliminate the viruses have been discussed. In the absence of such strategies in the case of PaLCuV at present, the few available options to control the disease include methods like removal of affected plants from the field, insecticide treatments against the insect vector (Bemisia tabaci), and gene-specific control through transgenic constructs. This review presents the current understanding of papaya leaf curl disease, genomic components including satellite DNA associated with the virus, wide host and vector range, and management of the disease and suggests possible generic resistance strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,477,697
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#111
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,685
of 313,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.