| Title |
The trans-boundary importance of artificial bat hibernacula in managed European forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0620-y |
| Authors |
Christian C. Voigt, Linn S. Lehnert, Ana G. Popa-Lisseanu, Mateusz Ciechanowski, Péter Estók, Florian Gloza-Rausch, Tamás Görföl, Matthias Göttsche, Carsten Harrje, Meike Hötzel, Tobias Teige, Reiner Wohlgemuth, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 16% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,073,283
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#476
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,658
of 311,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.